Posts: 23
Threads: 5
Thanks Received: 8 in 3 posts
Thanks Given: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
6
(02-12-2020, 07:15 PM)alex fox Wrote: please post the rate when you will get more than 200 battles because when it's under 50, the rate mean absolutely nothing statistically efficient
It's been a while since that post, I don't think that deck works very well now.
Due to the new matchmaking system, I advise you to use as low level cards as possible.
My lowest levels are 9 lev (my tower is 13lev), and with a 9 lev deck, the bot got average 30% wins, while with 12~13lev cards, It got less than 10%
I think the deck itself matters less than it did before - decks matter, but card levels matter more!
As always, this is just my humble opinion :P
![[-]](http://forums.clashroyalebot.com.br/images/collapse.png)
•
Posts: 9
Threads: 2
Thanks Received: 1 in 1 posts
Thanks Given: 1
Joined: Sep 2019
Reputation:
0
(02-26-2020, 02:41 PM)arget Wrote: (02-12-2020, 07:15 PM)alex fox Wrote: please post the rate when you will get more than 200 battles because when it's under 50, the rate mean absolutely nothing statistically efficient
It's been a while since that post, I don't think that deck works very well now.
Due to the new matchmaking system, I advise you to use as low level cards as possible.
My lowest levels are 9 lev (my tower is 13lev), and with a 9 lev deck, the bot got average 30% wins, while with 12~13lev cards, It got less than 10%
I think the deck itself matters less than it did before - decks matter, but card levels matter more!
As always, this is just my humble opinion  so you recommend 2-3-4 elixirs cards ?
•
Posts: 23
Threads: 5
Thanks Received: 8 in 3 posts
Thanks Given: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
6
(03-08-2020, 12:56 PM)alex fox Wrote: (02-26-2020, 02:41 PM)arget Wrote: (02-12-2020, 07:15 PM)alex fox Wrote: please post the rate when you will get more than 200 battles because when it's under 50, the rate mean absolutely nothing statistically efficient
It's been a while since that post, I don't think that deck works very well now.
Due to the new matchmaking system, I advise you to use as low level cards as possible.
My lowest levels are 9 lev (my tower is 13lev), and with a 9 lev deck, the bot got average 30% wins, while with 12~13lev cards, It got less than 10%
I think the deck itself matters less than it did before - decks matter, but card levels matter more!
As always, this is just my humble opinion so you recommend 2-3-4 elixirs cards ? Just the levels - because the matchmaking system matches similar leveled players, if you take low level cards, you get matched with low trophy players. Hence, the bot does better since it's playing with people who are not as good.
•
Posts: 9
Threads: 2
Thanks Received: 0 in 0 posts
Thanks Given: 1
Joined: Feb 2017
Reputation:
1
(02-27-2019, 09:09 AM)arget Wrote: [Only registered and activated users can see links Click here to register]
[Only registered and activated users can see links Click here to register]
As you can see, the card levels are low due to the fact that I don't spend money on clash royale, but it still works
The deck priorities are;
furnace 10
giant skel 7
sparky 7
and the rest 0 Thank you for the sharing, I am testing. I am currently at 56xx trophies.
•
Posts: 11
Threads: 2
Thanks Received: 0 in 0 posts
Thanks Given: 3
Joined: Nov 2016
Reputation:
0
(08-09-2019, 11:44 PM)Arget Wrote: [Only registered and activated users can see links Click here to register]
La idea principal es la misma, solo lo cambié porque había maximizado e-wiz, arqueros, horno, barril duende, caballero.
La idea es usar tarjetas que requieran poca sinergia y estrategia de colocación.
Sparkky y Gigante-skelly no requiere una colocación precisa, el horno no requiere sinergia, el espíritu de hielo funciona bien en cualquier lugar, etc.
and the priorities is 1vs1 or 2vs 2?
•
|
